Readify

Al Ulbrickson and George Pocock’s partnership

The Boys in the Boat

Al Ulbrickson and George Pocock’s partnership brought the Washington crew’s coaching and boatcraft into close practical alignment. Its importance appears not as a record of constant consultation, but in the complementary work each man did: Ulbrickson shaped the crew and its racing, while Pocock built and maintained the shells on which that work depended. After Washington’s historic sweep of the Hudson, Ulbrickson made the partnership’s significance unusually plain, thanking Pocock in person for his help.

A Partnership in Western Rowing

Their collaboration took shape against a sporting hierarchy that favored the East. In the 1920s and 1930s, collegiate crew attracted national attention, drew large crowds, and received extensive press coverage. Eastern private schools modeled rowing on elite British institutions and supplied oarsmen to universities such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. On the West Coast, the University of Washington and the University of California, Berkeley had built a heated rivalry, and western crews had begun to win respect, but their coaches were paid less than their eastern counterparts and their programs lacked recruitment funds and wealthy patrons.

The Poughkeepsie regatta embodied that imbalance. Eastern colleges had dominated for much of the early twentieth century; when Washington first traveled east under Hiram Conibear in 1913, its rural crew surprised spectators by finishing third. Yet western teams still faced the expense of transporting delicate boats across the country and the condescension of audiences accustomed to seeing elite young men rather than farmers, fishermen, and lumberjacks in the shells. The partnership between a Washington coach and a leading shell builder therefore operated within a larger effort to make western rowing competitive and visible.

The Shells and the Work Behind the Crew

Pocock’s contribution was both practical and exacting. At Poughkeepsie, he went from boathouse to boathouse to attend to the competing shells. Seventeen of the eighteen boats on the river that year had come from his shop. He adjusted riggers, renewed varnish, and made minor repairs; he wanted no shabby or derelict boat carrying his name. His attention extended even to the boats of Washington’s California rivals: the first boathouse he visited was next door, where he worked on Ky Ebright’s shells. Craftsmanship and professional service thus reached across the rivalry, even as the crews themselves remained intensely opposed.

Ulbrickson’s side of the partnership was expressed through training and race preparation. Following Washington’s Poughkeepsie success, he watched the boys row upriver in the warm summer dark and saw the grace and precision he wanted from them. His teasing question about why they had not rowed that way in the race was also a reminder that victory did not end the work: a short time later, Washington would need to race again in two 2,000-meter sprints for the right to represent the United States in Berlin. Ulbrickson was pleased with the result but wary of his crew becoming overconfident, and he remained responsible for keeping its discipline and purpose directed toward the next contest.

Recognition After the Hudson Victory

Washington’s victory brought the partnership into sharper focus. The varsity’s comeback was hailed by sportswriters as historic and unprecedented, and the celebration drew hundreds of fans to the shell house. Ulbrickson’s own explanation of the win centered on the crew rather than an individual: he said that every man had confidence in his mates and credited heartfelt cooperation over the spring. The account of his thinking makes clear that he saw the achievement as the convergence of strong oarsmen, a suitable boat, effective strategy at long and short distances, and a coxswain able to make difficult decisions quickly.

That assessment also helps define Pocock’s place in the relationship. The boat was not an incidental piece of equipment in Ulbrickson’s account of success: its balance and speed belonged among the conditions that allowed the crew’s abilities to work together. Walking back to the Princeton Inn that evening, Ulbrickson stopped, turned to Pocock, and extended his hand. His thanks were brief and direct. Pocock later recalled that, coming from Ulbrickson, the gesture was equivalent to fireworks and a brass band. The moment gives the partnership a rare personal expression: recognition from a coach who was not given to poetic speeches, offered to the boatbuilder whose work had helped the team reach its form.

Competition, Craft, and the Berlin Campaign

The partnership continued into the Olympic campaign, where the stakes extended beyond Washington’s rivalry with California. At the Olympic course on the Langer See, Ulbrickson challenged officials over the use of all six lanes. The outside lanes were exposed to prevailing winds, while the inside lanes were sheltered by the southern shore; in unfavorable conditions, the difference could amount to roughly two boat lengths. He had already canceled a workout rather than risk sending his crew into dangerous conditions in the exposed lanes, but the officials rejected his request to close lanes five and six. His intervention shows the coach attending not only to his crew’s form but also to the conditions under which they would have to compete.

Pocock’s preparation remained material and immediate. Before the Olympic racing, while the American rowers tried to keep Don Hume warm and rested, Pocock applied a coat of sperm whale oil to the underside of the Husky Clipper. The detail complements his earlier work among the Poughkeepsie boats: he cared for the shell as a racing instrument, maintaining it while the coach managed the people and circumstances around it. The book does not portray the two men as sharing every decision or method. Instead, it shows their partnership through distinct responsibilities that met in the same boat—Pocock’s workmanship and Ulbrickson’s direction—while the crew’s success depended on those contributions becoming part of a collective effort.